Your cart is currently empty!

ISO 10399:2017
ISO 10399:2017 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Duo-trio test
CDN $233.00
Description
ISO 10399:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for
a) determining that
- either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
- a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and
b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
– the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
– the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
Edition
3
Published Date
2017-12-07
Status
PUBLISHED
Pages
21
Format 
Secure PDF
Secure – PDF details
- Save your file locally or view it via a web viewer
- Viewing permissions are restricted exclusively to the purchaser
- Device limits - 3
- Printing – Enabled only to print (1) copy
See more about our Environmental Commitment

Abstract
ISO 10399:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for
a) determining that
- either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
- a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and
b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
Previous Editions
Can’t find what you are looking for?
Please contact us at:
Related Documents
-
ISO 6658:2017 Sensory analysis – Methodology – General guidance
0 out of 5CDN $233.00 Add to cart -
ISO 13300:2006 Sensory analysis – General guidance for the staff of a sensory evaluation laboratory – Part 2: Recruitment and training of panel leaders
0 out of 5CDN $115.00 Add to cart -
ISO 29842:2024 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Balanced incomplete block designs
0 out of 5CDN $233.00 Add to cart -
ISO 8586:2023 Sensory analysis – Selection and training of sensory assessors
0 out of 5CDN $312.00 Add to cart