REGISTER

FR
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 14L: Lock Mandrels and Landing Nipples : Reaffirmed

$

273

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 20F: Corrosion Resistant Bolting for Use in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries : Reaffirmed

$

169

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API TR 5NCL Nickel Content Limits for API 5CT Sour Service Products

$

149

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 19ICD: Inflow Control Devices : Reaffirmed

$

189

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 23.2: Reconciliation of Liquid Tank Car(s) Quantities : Reaffirmed

$

218

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 16A: Specification for Drill-through Equipment

$

322

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-2: Field Testing Oil-based Drilling Fluids wA1

$

388

BUY NOW

ISO 11132:2021

ISO 11132:2021 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Guidelines for the measurement of the performance of a quantitative descriptive sensory panel

CDN $233.00

SKU: 7b1cf388a06d Category:

Description

This document gives guidelines for assessing the overall performance of a quantitative descriptive panel and the performance of each panel member.

This document is applicable to the validation of the training of individual assessors or panels, as well as to the performance monitoring of established panels.

This document does not apply to the panel performance for descriptive methods where the individual scores of each assessor are not recorded, where there is no single list of attributes that is common to all the assessors, or where dominance rather than intensity is measured. Consequently, the performance of descriptive panels using methods such as consensus profile, free-choice profile, flash profile and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) are out of scope.

The methods specified in this document are for monitoring and assessing the ability of a panel and its assessors to discriminate between products, the agreement between assessors of the same panel and the repeatability of these assessors in their intensity scoring.

Reproducibility, including both the comparison between panels and the comparison within the same panel of several evaluations conducted under different conditions (i.e. separated in time), is out of scope of this document.

The methods specified in this document can be used, in full or a selection only, by the panel leader to appraise continuously the performance of panels or individual assessors. The methods listed are not exhaustive and other appropriate methods can also be used.

Edition

2

Published Date

2021-09-08

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

22

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document gives guidelines for assessing the overall performance of a quantitative descriptive panel and the performance of each panel member.

This document is applicable to the validation of the training of individual assessors or panels, as well as to the performance monitoring of established panels.

This document does not apply to the panel performance for descriptive methods where the individual scores of each assessor are not recorded, where there is no single list of attributes that is common to all the assessors, or where dominance rather than intensity is measured. Consequently, the performance of descriptive panels using methods such as consensus profile, free-choice profile, flash profile and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) are out of scope.

The methods specified in this document are for monitoring and assessing the ability of a panel and its assessors to discriminate between products, the agreement between assessors of the same panel and the repeatability of these assessors in their intensity scoring.

Reproducibility, including both the comparison between panels and the comparison within the same panel of several evaluations conducted under different conditions (i.e. separated in time), is out of scope of this document.

The methods specified in this document can be used, in full or a selection only, by the panel leader to appraise continuously the performance of panels or individual assessors. The methods listed are not exhaustive and other appropriate methods can also be used.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: