REGISTER

FR
Search
×
FR

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 14L: Lock Mandrels and Landing Nipples : Reaffirmed

$

273

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 20F: Corrosion Resistant Bolting for Use in the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries : Reaffirmed

$

169

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API TR 5NCL Nickel Content Limits for API 5CT Sour Service Products

$

149

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 19ICD: Inflow Control Devices : Reaffirmed

$

189

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API MPMS CH 23.2: Reconciliation of Liquid Tank Car(s) Quantities : Reaffirmed

$

218

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API SPEC 16A: Specification for Drill-through Equipment

$

322

BUY NOW

Placeholder headline

This is just a placeholder headline

API RP 13B-2: Field Testing Oil-based Drilling Fluids wA1

$

388

BUY NOW

ISO 16256:2021

ISO 16256:2021 Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems – Broth micro-dilution reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against yeast fungi involved in infectious diseases

CDN $173.00

SKU: 88d2ea6a14d7 Category:

Description

This document describes a method for testing the susceptibility to antifungal agents of yeasts, including Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans, that cause infections. The reference method described here has not been used in studies of the yeast forms of dimorphic fungi, such as Blastomyces dermatitidis and/or Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum. Moreover, testing filamentous fungi (moulds) introduces several additional problems in standardization not addressed by the current procedure. Those methods are beyond the scope of this document.

This document describes the broth micro-dilution reference method, which can be implemented by either of two pathways. One pathway involves visual determination of MICs (CLSI method)[1][5]; the second pathway involves spectrophotometric determination of MICs (EUCAST method)[2][10]. The MIC reflects the activity of the drug under the described test conditions and can be interpreted for clinical management purposes by taking into account other factors, such as drug pharmacology or antifungal resistance mechanisms. In addition, MIC distributions can be used to define wild type or non-wild type fungal populations. Clinical interpretation of the MIC value is beyond the scope of this document; interpretive category breakpoints specific to the CLSI- and EUCAST-derived methods can be found by consulting the latest interpretive tables provided by the organizations[5][15]. Routine susceptibility testing methods or diagnostic test devices can be compared with this reference method in order to ensure comparable and reliable results for validation or registration purposes.

Edition

2

Published Date

2021-10-14

Status

PUBLISHED

Pages

16

Language Detail Icon

English

Format Secure Icon

Secure PDF

Abstract

This document describes a method for testing the susceptibility to antifungal agents of yeasts, including Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans, that cause infections. The reference method described here has not been used in studies of the yeast forms of dimorphic fungi, such as Blastomyces dermatitidis and/or Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum. Moreover, testing filamentous fungi (moulds) introduces several additional problems in standardization not addressed by the current procedure. Those methods are beyond the scope of this document.

This document describes the broth micro-dilution reference method, which can be implemented by either of two pathways. One pathway involves visual determination of MICs (CLSI method)[1][5]; the second pathway involves spectrophotometric determination of MICs (EUCAST method)[2][10]. The MIC reflects the activity of the drug under the described test conditions and can be interpreted for clinical management purposes by taking into account other factors, such as drug pharmacology or antifungal resistance mechanisms. In addition, MIC distributions can be used to define wild type or non-wild type fungal populations. Clinical interpretation of the MIC value is beyond the scope of this document; interpretive category breakpoints specific to the CLSI- and EUCAST-derived methods can be found by consulting the latest interpretive tables provided by the organizations[5][15]. Routine susceptibility testing methods or diagnostic test devices can be compared with this reference method in order to ensure comparable and reliable results for validation or registration purposes.

Previous Editions

Can’t find what you are looking for?

Please contact us at: